Tuesday, August 13, 2013
Event Risk in the coming month (and a bit)
21/08/13 - Release of minutes from 30-31/07 FOMC meeting
05/09/13 - 1) Japan announces its 2014 money supply target, 2) ECB Interest Rate decision
09/09/13 - Congress returns to session
18/09/13 - FOMC decision and press conference
22/09/13 - German federal elections
30/09/13 - Deadline for Congress to prevent government shutdown
Thursday, August 8, 2013
Europe?
Stronger macro data suggests that the worst of the Eurozone
crisis may be behind us. Last week, Eurozone consumer confidence strengthened
for the eight consecutive month, which could bode well for consumer spending in
coming months.
New orders placed with German manufacturers jumped a
seasonally adjusted 3.8% monthly, more than reversing May's revised 0.5%
decrease. Italy's longest recession in the post- World War II era eased in the
second quarter of 2013 with the gross domestic product declining 0.2% on the
quarter — the slowest pace in nearly two years. Britain's industrial production
was up 1.1% on the month following three consecutive months of zero growth. The
1.1% increase was the fastest since July 2012, when it grew 3.1%.
^^
This is the consensus it seems. I'm skeptical. Countries are broke, burgeoned with debt. No-one really knows whats going on. But, for sure, those who have been thick skinned in the last year have reaped the rewards. Look towards equity markets, peripheral debt. Is it too late to get in? Maybe. But this may give you some food for thought:
Tuesday, August 6, 2013
Understanding new GDP calculations for the US
Intellectual property product investment (IPP) has been
added to the National Income & Product Accounts (NIPA) – as party of July’s
benchmark GDP revisions (hence inflating GDP to 1.7% - although this far beat expectations of 1.1% regardless). The new category introduces
spending on entertainment, artistic and literary originals (EALO) (basically
goods that the rich can afford), software and R&D. Software, however, has
already been around in the GDP measurements but has been reassigned from one
way or another – something about ‘legacy equipment investment’ category. Adding
R&D and EALO has lead to an increase in real GDP growth by 0.07% (approx..)
since 1947 with large contributions during the .com boom in the 90s.
Thursday, August 1, 2013
Japanese debt: A perspective for beginners (i.e. myself!)
2012 – Japan’s central govt was 997trn in debt, that’s 200%
of GDP, and more than $80,000 (USD) per capita.
To understand any debt workflow:
The government collects taxes from households and corporations.
The government spends.
If wants to spend more than revenues, issues bonds.
When outstanding debts get too large, central bank lowers the interest rates or buys bonds.
For the government to spend more, it issues debt again.
Investors buy (and receive interest).
Investors worry when debts get too large.
Then Central Bank lowers interest rates.
Investors’ worries are intermittently allayed, and they continue investing.
Eventually it leads to an inescapable trap.
Each year the government has to pay interest, and fund other expenditures.
Investors sell.
Government cannot spend what it does not borrow.
Printing press can’t help now.
Inflation been going on as well.
Investors sell bonds to account for inflation.
Debt costs are higher than tax revenues.
The government spends.
If wants to spend more than revenues, issues bonds.
When outstanding debts get too large, central bank lowers the interest rates or buys bonds.
For the government to spend more, it issues debt again.
Investors buy (and receive interest).
Investors worry when debts get too large.
Then Central Bank lowers interest rates.
Investors’ worries are intermittently allayed, and they continue investing.
Eventually it leads to an inescapable trap.
Each year the government has to pay interest, and fund other expenditures.
Investors sell.
Government cannot spend what it does not borrow.
Printing press can’t help now.
Inflation been going on as well.
Investors sell bonds to account for inflation.
Debt costs are higher than tax revenues.
To put this in perspective for Japan, let’s take figures
from the end of 2012 fiscal year – Japan’s debt was 23x revenues. 1% increase
in average debt cost increases overall interest expense by 23% of tax revenues.
By this calculation, the govt needs to keep debt costs lower than 4%. Can they
do this? Yields are only 0.8% at the moment. But what about in the future? Let’s
look at investor rationale.
Japanese investors – JGB bond prices are very high, and a
lot has been invested in JGBs by locals. But savings are declining with an
ageing population, so can they keep the demand for the debt so high?
Foreign investors see only 0.8% yield?! OK inflation in real terms is low, so the yield is now that bad. Last year yields were around -1% with inflation of -1%, that’s a real return of 2%, right?! But now, inflation has been increasing, (0.2% June YoY, -0.2% if you discount food and energy prices) and will continue to increase because of the 3 arrow approach taken by Abe and Kuroda. They are targeting 2% inflation, so to keep real returns constant the average debt cost may rise to 4% and this is the critical point.
Foreign investors see only 0.8% yield?! OK inflation in real terms is low, so the yield is now that bad. Last year yields were around -1% with inflation of -1%, that’s a real return of 2%, right?! But now, inflation has been increasing, (0.2% June YoY, -0.2% if you discount food and energy prices) and will continue to increase because of the 3 arrow approach taken by Abe and Kuroda. They are targeting 2% inflation, so to keep real returns constant the average debt cost may rise to 4% and this is the critical point.
The Kyle Bass view (Hayman Capital) is essentially that
there will be a collapse in Japanese bond yields because its expansion
ultimately engenders this Weimar style of hyperinflation. – and you can watch
some of his talks online for example here.
What this does not take into account however is that, whilst
it well know that in a recovery, bond yields go up, the extreme scenario is
unconvincing. This is because it doesn’t account for the increase in tax
revenue that will follow from increase in GDP – the Japanese tax structure is
very pro-cyclical (although less so now than in the 1990s due to the
introduction of consumption tax). The origin of fiscal stresses isn’t really
fiscal spending but instead is tax revenue based – tax revenue today is only
60% of the level of 1990. Personal tax revenues have gone down compared to GDP,
and consumption tax hasn’t done much to replace loss of tax revenue. However if
Japan truly does grow, the increased strength in fiscal position could be
enough to offset interest payment increases.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

